Let's begin with a thought-provoking premise: the European Championship, or EURO, is tougher than the World Cup. This assertion is certainly up for debate, as many might initially believe that the World Cup, with its global participation, should naturally be more challenging. The EURO, after all, involves just one confederation, akin to the Asian Cup, Copa America, and Africa Cup of Nations. However, numerous footballers who have competed in both tournaments argue that the EURO is indeed more demanding than the World Cup.
Which footballer claims this, and is it really true that the EURO is more difficult? Let’s delve into it. Recently, Kylian Mbappe, a crucial player for both Real Madrid and the French national team, made headlines with his bold statement. As EURO 2024 approaches, the 25-year-old remarked, "The EURO is complicated. For me, it's more complicated than the World Cup." This comment sparked significant discussion among football enthusiasts and experts alike.
Kylian Mbappe said Euro is more difficult to win than the World Cup because he hasn't won it
— Elias (@FCB_Elias1) June 4, 2024
In 5 years, he'll say the UCL is more difficult to win at Real Madrid
He's bringing that 'it's difficult mentality' to Real Madrid 😂✍️ pic.twitter.com/ydMV5LfN6s
Although Mbappe acknowledges the significant pressure that comes with playing in the World Cup, he argues that this doesn't necessarily make it more challenging. According to him, the European Championship, or EURO, is tougher due to the familiarity and competitiveness among the teams. Players frequently face each other in various competitions, leading to similar tactical approaches and high-quality gameplay across the board. Mbappe's reasoning holds water, as the tournament features only European teams, ensuring a level playing field in terms of style, tactics, and quality. This intense competition is what Mbappe believes makes the EURO more difficult.
Supporting Mbappe's view is Xavi Hernandez, who led Spain to consecutive EURO victories. Quoted by Sky Sports, the former Al-Sadd coach remarked that winning the EURO is indeed more challenging than the World Cup. Xavi emphasized that the strength parity among European teams makes the EURO a formidable test.
In 2012 Xavi Hernandez was asked which is more difficult between winning the Euro or the World Cup, and he chose the Euro.
— 𝗡𝗮𝗵𝘂𝗲𝗹 🇦🇷 𝕏 𓃵 (@RealGOA7) January 13, 2024
The Euro is always more valuable than a World Cup; especially one rigged on penalties. https://t.co/NalbivRg5E pic.twitter.com/liPMwIVm5X
"In the World Cup, you might encounter teams like Honduras or Saudi Arabia, but in the European Cup, any team can defeat you," remarked Wesley Sneijder before EURO 2012. Quoted by Reuters, Sneijder emphasized that the absence of African teams in the EURO adds to its difficulty.
However, contrasting opinions have surfaced, particularly from Argentine national team players. Lionel Messi, in response to Mbappe's statement, offered a compelling counterpoint. Messi asserted that while the EURO is undoubtedly a significant competition, it lacks the presence of Argentina, a three-time world champion, Brazil, a five-time world champion, and Uruguay, a two-time world champion. According to Messi, numerous world champions affirm that the World Cup is the most challenging tournament.
🚨🗣️ - Lionel Messi responds to Kylian Mbappé:
— 𝐀𝐅𝐂 𝐀𝐉𝐀𝐗 💎 (@TheEuropeanLad) June 12, 2024
“Mbappe said that that the EURO’s are more difficult than the World Cup? He also said that the South American teams didn't have the same high competition as the Europeans. Everyone values what they play.
The EURO’s is very… pic.twitter.com/R1CfltWCjA
Other Albiceleste stalwarts, Emiliano Martinez and Leandro Paredes, also disagree with the notion that the EURO is more difficult than the World Cup. Lisandro Martinez of the Red Devils provided a more balanced perspective, stating, "I don't want to underestimate or assume anything. All competitions are very difficult to win," as quoted by Clarin.
To move beyond mere opinions, let's examine the facts. Notably, no country has won the European Championship more than three times. Spain and Germany hold the record, each with three titles—Spain in 1964, 2008, and 2012, and Germany in 1972, 1980, and 1996. In contrast, Brazil has won the World Cup five times, while Germany and Italy have each claimed four titles.
It's important to note that the World Cup predates the European Championship by 30 years, having been established in 1930, while the EURO began in 1960. From 1960 to 2012, no nation managed to win consecutive EURO titles until Vicente del Bosque's Spain broke the trend in 2012. Since then, no team has managed to defend their title successfully. Portugal, the 2016 champions, fell short in 2020, and it remains to be seen how Italy will fare in 2024.
In comparison, the World Cup has seen two instances of back-to-back champions: Italy in 1934 and 1938, and Brazil in 1958 and 1962. These facts underscore the unique challenges and historical contexts of both tournaments.
Since 1960, no final in the European Championship has been repeated. Each of the 16 editions has featured unique matchups. In contrast, the World Cup has seen repeated finals. For instance, Brazil and Italy faced off in both the 1970 and 1994 finals. Argentina and West Germany met in the finals of 1986 and 1990, with each country winning once.
The EURO often crowns new champions. The Netherlands won their first title in 1988, Denmark triumphed in 1992 despite never reaching a final before, and Portugal clinched their maiden title in 2016. Greece's victory in 2004 was especially surprising, as they hadn't qualified for the five previous tournaments. On the other hand, the World Cup rarely sees new champions. Recent editions have been won by countries with previous titles.
Qualifying for the EURO is also a formidable challenge. Many European countries that frequently qualify for the World Cup struggle to make it to the EURO. For example, Serbia is participating in the EURO for the first time, despite having qualified for three World Cups as Serbia. Norway has only appeared in one EURO (2000) despite qualifying for three World Cups. Switzerland, a regular World Cup participant, has only competed in six EUROs, one of which was as a host in 2008.
Mbappe's point that the EURO features teams with similar styles and strengths holds merit. Europe is the heart of football, with most countries boasting advanced football programs. When such teams compete against each other, the difficulty level rises. The EURO often places elite teams in the same group, such as the fierce competition expected in EURO 2024 with Spain, Italy, and Croatia drawn together. This makes the group stage highly challenging.
In the World Cup, however, elite European teams can find themselves grouped with teams from other continents, such as Asia, Africa, or North America, which can sometimes make it easier for them to advance to the knockout stages. Yet, the diversity of the teams in the World Cup adds its own layer of difficulty. Facing teams from different continents with varying styles and strengths requires adaptability and strategic acumen.
So, football enthusiasts, which tournament do you think is tougher: the World Cup or the European Championship?
No comments